Allegedly. Regina Rowe Hicks 7/28/24
See how ABC are framing this — we run every side, so you decide. News for humans, not bots: serious, civil discussion among real people, with the context and facts you need. Don't just watch: be on the air with your own video takes, polls and predictions.
EVERY NETWORK'S FRAMING
Add your voice
"Allegedly" is legally required in U.S. news to protect broadcasters.
Under U.S. defamation law, reporting unproven accusations as fact can expose networks to lawsuits. The word "allegedly" signals charges haven't been proven in court — a journalistic standard formalized after landmark 1960s libel rulings.
The word 'allegedly' protects a core legal right in the U.S.
News outlets use 'allegedly' to uphold the presumption of innocence — a bedrock of U.S. law ensuring accused persons aren't convicted before trial. Learn more at Wikipedia
'Allegedly' became standard in news after a landmark 1964 Supreme Court ruling.
In NYT v. Sullivan (1964), SCOTUS ruled public figures must prove 'actual malice' to win defamation suits. This pushed journalists to use 'allegedly' to signal unproven claims and protect against liability.
Topic poll · all networksIn U.S. law, what does 'allegedly' protect journalists from?
- Defamation lawsuits
- Copyright claims
- Contempt of court
- Perjury charges
Guess, then reveal the answer
Defamation lawsuits
Topic poll · all networksWhat makes Regina Rowe Hicks' story stand out to you?
"Allegedly" is a legal shield — it protects both reporters and the accused!
In U.S. law, the presumption of innocence means charges are unproven until a verdict. Media use "allegedly" to reflect this standard. Learn more at Wikipedia