LiveNOW from Fox · updated 2026-06-24

COURT RULES FORMER LOUISIANA INMATE CANNOT SUE PRISON

See how LiveNOW from Fox are framing this — we run every side, so you decide. News for humans, not bots: serious, civil discussion among real people, with the context and facts you need. Don't just watch: be on the air with your own video takes, polls and predictions.

LiveNOW from Fox

“SUPREME COURT SET TO RULE ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP”

covered 2026-06-24 ▶ Be on the air with LiveNOW from Fox

Add your voice

Polls, predictions & fact-checks we ran live across networks — your take joins the running tally, compared across every network.

The key birthright citizenship case involved a SF cook!

In 1898, Wong Kim Ark — born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants — was denied re-entry to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled 6-2 he was a citizen, setting the precedent still being debated today.

This storyShould the Supreme Court limit birthright citizenship?

  • Yes — end automatic citizenship 0%
  • Only for legal residents' kids 0%
  • No — 14th Amendment is clear 0%
  • Too early to say without ruling 0%

Be the first to weigh in

Legal analysts translate courtroom complexity for the public in real time.

As a Legal Analyst, Neama Rahmani breaks down legal proceedings for live audiences — a role that requires both law practice experience and communication skill. Learn more at Wikipedia

The 14th Amendment's birthright rule was tested in 1898 by a cook!

Wong Kim Ark, a San Francisco chef born to Chinese immigrants, won a Supreme Court case establishing that U.S.-born children of immigrants are citizens — a precedent still at the heart of today's debate.

The 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act cut inmate lawsuits by over 40%.

Signed by President Clinton, the PLRA requires inmates to exhaust all internal prison grievance procedures before filing suit. It also caps damages and adds filing fees, sharply reducing federal civil rights filings.

This storyShould prisons lose federal funding for violating inmates' religious rights?

  • Yes — funding should be cut 0%
  • Only after repeated violations 0%
  • No — courts should handle it 0%
  • Depends on the violation 0%

Be the first to weigh in

…and 3 more when you're on the air.

The conversation

No comments yet — be the first to add your voice when you're on the air. Civil, moderated, bot-free.

LIVE ROOMS Rooms open during live coverage 1 channel ▾
LiveNOW from Fox ▶ Be on the air